That said there have been a few things that have made me wonder if I am swimming upstream trying to run darktable on a Mac, and if I should just sell it and move to the primary darktable environment Linux (new environment for me). I also like the technical fundamentals of unbounded, linear, large color space, GPU processing then fitting to output constraints. But darktable seems to offer the best of both worlds. I started digital photography editing with traditional “layer-based” (PS style) application and have no “fixed-pipeline” (LR style) application experience. I really like darktable, have only been using for about a year, but think it’s great. We really need a long term dedication to solve this.Īn Open Source software can only offer what If you are interested to help, please step forward. To the role of OSX maintainer, we will be forced toįully and completely stop supporting OS X, In summary, unless someone steps forwards and commits To someday make use of the compiler (and library)įeatures introduced in later compiler versions. Not having a path forward makes it impossible Not only is this support matrix unsustainable, In addition to currently supporting three GCC releases. That puts us to 7 ( sic) LLVM versions to support, XCode version is XCode 12.4 (LLVM10-based),Īnd with LLVM16 about to be released in ~April, That wants to end that tenure, and pass on the mantle.Īt the same time, there is a big roadblock on the OS X side:Ĭurrently, as requested by the minimal required We would like to thank him for all of his efforts!Įverything has it’s limit, and presently, it has been indicated Especially, maintenance of the darktable asĪs it happens, has been a person solely responsibleįor maintaining, and packaging, darktable on OS X One particular area that is always everyone’s not-first choice As everybody knows, darktable is a community-driven project.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |